<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>EFPA model for the review, description and evaluation of psychological and educational test</title>
    <subTitle>: test review form and notes for reviewers</subTitle>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Hernandez Baeza, Ana Maria</namePart>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <genre authority="">PsiLibros</genre>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Bruxelles</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>: EFPA</publisher>
    <dateIssued>, 2024</dateIssued>
    <dateIssued encoding="marc">2024</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">Ing</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">lés</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>81 p.</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>INTRODUCTION 
How the model should be used 
Note on this revision 
Previous versions

PART 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT 
1. Factual description 
2. Classification 
3. Measurement and scoring
4. Digitally-generated reports
5. Supply arrangements and materials
Short stand-alone non-evaluative description

PART 2. EVALUATION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Information sources 
Explanation of ratings

6. Quality of the explanation of the rationale, its presentation and the information provided 
6.1. Rationale and development 
6.2. Adequacy of documentation available to the user 
6.3. Quality of the procedural instructions provided for the user 
6.4. Overall adequacy 
7. Quality of the test materials 
7.1. Quality of technology-enabled test materials 
7.2. Quality of paper-&amp;-pencil and other non-technology enabled test materials 
General guidance on assigning ratings for the next 3 chapters 

8. Norms
Introduction 
8.1. Norm-referenced interpretation 
8.2. Criterion-referenced interpretation
8.3. Overall adequacy 

9. Reliability/Precision
General guidance on assigning ratings for this section 

10. Validity
General guidance on assigning ratings for this section 
10.1. Test content based validity evidence
10.2. Validity evidence based on relations to other variables
10.3. Evidence based on the internal structure (dimensionality) of the test
10.4. Validity evidence based on other sources 
10.5. Overall evidence validity 
11. Fairness, Diversity and Cultural Breadth 
12. Quality of digitally generated reports
Final evaluation</abstract>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">/ [Ana Maria Hernandez Baeza ... et al.]</note>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Instrumentos para la evaluación</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="">
    <topic>Intervención psicológica</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="">
    <topic>Investigación científica</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="">
    <topic>Tests clínicos</topic>
  </subject>
  <identifier type="uri">https://www.efpa.eu/sites/default/files/2024-11/2024-11-18_test-review-model_draft-for-consultation.pdf</identifier>
  <location>
    <url displayLabel="Acceso electrónico">https://www.efpa.eu/sites/default/files/2024-11/2024-11-18_test-review-model_draft-for-consultation.pdf</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">COPM</recordContentSource>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">250114</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20250114125540.0</recordChangeDate>
    <languageOfCataloging>
      <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">spa</languageTerm>
    </languageOfCataloging>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
